Side-channel attacks on Airgapped SVS accepted Legacy (Tails/SVS)
THREAT160
· Accepted: The team has decided to live with this risk.
· Defined in catalog.py:2753
- Risk
- High impact × Very Low likelihood = 3 low
- After mitigations
- High impact × Very Low likelihood = 3 low (unchanged)
Side-channel attacks could extract SVS private-key material using electromagnetic or acoustic
Threat actors: Nation State / Law Enforcement
Mitigations
No mitigations in place.
Possible further mitigations
- SCIF for airgap workstation MITIG224 Legacy (Tails/SVS) proposed
Residual risk
Candidate for further mitigation efforts.
Where it applies
Applies to 1 component in 2 scenarios.
- Secure Viewing Station Legacy (Tails/SVS)
Transfer & decrypt Legacy (Tails/SVS) · Secure Viewing Station
Publish & export Legacy (Tails/SVS) · Secure Viewing Station
Notes
Existing mitigations: None. Further mitigations: Admin guide should instruct SVS be located in a room without windows and as little electronic devices as possible - basically a SCIF (MITIG224). Automated test for mitigation: No.
How this threat is matched
Listed for these components. A boundary covers every component inside it.